Is this another one of those emotional-thought provoking tumblr post that’ll bore you half way through a bad movie?
NO
Hmm but then again I know I’ve done those emotional posts, but I doubt I’m much of a tinker to post something thought provoking.
So anyway, I just to cut the the message short, I just had an operation for an inflamed appendix. And I’m still on the road to recovery, having gone 4 weeks with out visiting the gym or running 2.4km is causing me to feel lethargic constantly.
I was fortunate enough to be given the luxury of staying in an un-subsidised B1 ward which came with air-condinitioning and my own personal Sony LCD TV! Heck they even gave me a complimentary toiletry bag stuffed with a amenities. Do I care? Not much, but thanks Mom!
Am I bragging? Nope just my way of saying thanks and sharing the experience… and “dick heads” to those who had the impression I was bragging :P
OKAY… So looks like I really didn’t cut straight to the point. So here’s the gist, I decided to make the announcement on Tumblr instead of Facebook because I’d bet I’d get a barrage of comments shooting down a kit lens.
“So then why even post it up in the first place.”
Well it’s for those who need to know, to know heh… I spent many hours contemplating this thought: “Sell the Nikon AF-S 16-35 f/4 VRII N” and make the step down and buy a “Nikon AF-S 18-200 f/3.5-5.6 VRII” Back to back comparison, one’s a pro-grade lens which I’ve weather beaten and taken to several countries and the other is a mere expansive kit lens.
Specs wise, I was never really bothered with how much glass a lens packed, or what it’s MTF charts read, sure it’s great for marketing, but I couldn’t really pass off a judgement till I tried for myself.
So when I got back from the hospital, I slapped on the 18-55 VRII lens onto my D300 and photographed my bookshelf, I did the same with my 16-35, and it was… ridiculous.
Sure, I care about the sharpness of the lens and it’s ability to have tact on focusing, but at f/5.6 both lenses looked so identical, to me, there and then I made the decision to downgrade to the 18-200.
Here’s the sad truth many people don’t want to deal with, though its been said many times over and over again: “IT’S NOT YOUR CAMERA/GEAR/EQUIPMENT/ETC, IT’S YOU THAT MATTERS.”
Don’t get me wrong, I’ve never ONCE implied I’m good or as good as any one. I’m just a mere hobbyist sharing my moment of self-actualization. I went through, what most photography hobbyist went through, the Gear Acquisition Syndrome (GAS) period. It’s a time where usually one just starts out his or her journey into photography and the constant hunger to buy huge fat f/2.8 lenses that cost a metric ton of cash, never dies!
Did I go there? Sure I did. I slogged for months at part time jobs during holidays and bought lenses like the Nikon AF-S 28-70 f/2.8 or the Nikon AF-S 16-35 f/4 VRII N. Did I end up selling them? YES.
Why? It’s because these lenses are BIG-PROFESSIONAL-MONSTER-LENSES. Do I need them for the kinda “thing” I do?
Not at all. Sure holding a big f/2.8 lens caught the tons of attention from my peers in school, sure was one hell of an ego boost haha, maybe a self-defence weapon at best. But here’s my personal experience with them: Their so huge and fat, its a TURN OFF to take them out, to shoot with your friends.
The only time I’ve ever used the lenses seriously and to it’s maximum capability was while being overseas. Even then, it was nothing short of a, how shall I put it delicately, “pain-in-the-ass” to carry around, given I still had a backpack or luggage to haul around. Hell, it’s such a turn off to use such big pro lenses that I often found myself, simply not using them at all!
So there are those people who stare at test charts, MTF curves, and spec sheets more than actually using the lens itself, who will claim that having f/2.8 allows low light photography, blah blah blah… ba blah ba blah… And this is a fact many don’t want to face: FX is disgustingly expansive. BUT DX IS JUST AS GOOD.
I dare you(if your able to accept the truth, as some spread-sheet-geeks might get a heart attack), compare the noise/grain from an Ilford Delta 3200 film to ISO3200 on a D300. The D300 despite being DX, is much CLEANER (I never said it was better or sharper) than the picture from an Ilford Delta 3200. So what am I trying to say is: Stop whining DX doesn’t churn out good ISO performance, jack-up the ISO, and just use a kit lens. It saves you the weight and mood to even shoot. Pictures even at high ISOs like 3200 are still usable for most things.
I say all this for the general hobbyist who are into photography, for photography. Not to stroke ego’s with big fancy lenses. Because honestly, how sad can you get, if you need a big lens to stroke your ego -__-…
If your a sports fanatic and taking action is your thing or you shoot in conditions where you need to freeze your subject in low light, by all means, these expansive f/2.8 or f/1.4 lenses are your thing.
So then those who read this far might ask, what is my “thing?” Well I’m just a mere hobbyist sharing my little observations I’ve made of the people around me, and of the recently decision I’ve made to shift from a pro-grade lens to an expansive kit lens. I photograph anything in God’s green earth which catches my eye.
For those who’ve read this far, congratulations, I hope you’ve been enlightened a little.
P.S. Kudos to those still holding on faithfully to their kit lenses.